Vance Betche opened issue #1: Australian Politicians Took $147,000 of Match T...

Vance Betche
2026-04-11T01:14:18Z

Politicians took 312 sport tickets while parliament was considering gambling reform

Tickets were worth A$ 245,000 ($147,000)

Gambling advertising restriction shelved despite public recommendation

(Adds Kate Chaney remark in paragraph 20)

By Byron Kaye

SYDNEY, April 16 (Reuters) - Australian politicians were talented about A$ 245,000 ($147,000) in match tickets over almost 2 years by the nation's most popular sporting leagues as part of a lobbying campaign against a proposed ban on marketing of online gambling, according to Reuters computations based on government files.

Lobbying by the betting market versus the restriction has been reported previously in media however the computation of the total value of tickets declared by political leaders in the parliamentary gift register reveals the role played by sporting bodies and offers a dollar quantity for the very first time.

Labor Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had actually assured a crackdown on betting marketing following a 2023 parliamentary inquiry bought by his government that suggested a "comprehensive ban on all types of advertising for online betting".

But he took the issue off the legal agenda late in 2015 and has actually left it to be considered by a new parliament to be formed following a Might 3 general election that his party is tipped to win by a narrow margin. Polls show that three-quarters of Australians want a restriction.

"We understand beneficial interests have been lobbying difficult to avoid a ban and the level of soft diplomacy revealed by this analysis of declared presents to political leaders is deeply worrying," said David Pocock, an independent senator.

"It is appalling that 18 months after the landmark report into online gambling damage, and after a full regard to a Labor federal government, the prime minister has actually stopped working to take any meaningful action to ban betting advertising."

Albanese and the AFL did not react to Reuters ask for remark. The NRL declined remark.

Such lobbying is not prohibited in Australia but private presents worth over A$ 300 received by parliamentarians must be reported to the prime minister's workplace, which keeps the parliamentary gift register, a public database.

It reveals that politicians from both Australia's primary celebrations received 312 totally free tickets in between June 28, 2023, when the government report suggested a restriction on online gambling advertisements, and March 28 this year when parliament was liquified.

There was no rate credited the tickets but Reuters computed their worth based upon the most inexpensive business box seat. The computations were confirmed by Hunter Fujak, senior speaker in sports management at Deakin University, and Tim Harcourt, chief economist at the University of Technology, Sydney's Centre for Sport, Business and Society.

"It's a reasonable quote, probably on the conservative side," Harcourt said.

PM, OPPOSITION LEADER GIVEN TICKETS

Albanese got A$ 29,000 worth of tickets, mostly to grand finals and video games played by his NRL home team, the South Sydney Rabbitohs, the present register showed.

Peter Dutton, leader of the opposition conservative coalition, got A$ 21,350 of tickets during the duration, the register shows.

Dutton's workplace did not react to an ask for comment.

The gifted tickets over the 21-month duration compared with tickets worth an estimated A$ 234,000 offered to politicians in the previous parliamentary term from 2019 to 2022, although at that time was impacted by COVID-19 shutdowns. Data before 2019 was not readily available.

Australians lose the most on betting in the world on a per capita basis, government information shows. Consultancy H2 Gambling Capital estimates gamblers in Australia will lose A$ 34 billion in 2025. The nation's sports bodies benefit since, unlike in many other countries, they take a percentage cut of money bet on their video games. They also make revenues from sponsorship and broadcast rights.

In a personal submission to federal government, the NRL stated the percentage sufficed gets from gambling, presently about A$ 70 million a year, would be more than cut in half if the restriction enters into force, stated an individual who saw the file. The source declined to be determined since the submission has actually not been launched publicly.

The portion cut, although a small portion of its A$ 745 million total income in 2024, is the NRL's fastest-growing earnings stream after increasing fifteen-fold in a years, the individual stated.

The NRL on the other hand associates about one-third of the A$ 400 million a year it makes in broadcast rights - its primary earner - to sports betting advertising, the person stated.

Kate Chaney, an independent who was on the parliamentary committee that produced the 2023 report calling for the restriction, stated Australian sporting bodies were "addicted to gambling money" and "making choices based upon what's great for their financial practicality, not for sport in Australia".

The government did not react to questions about the submission and its assessment procedure, while the NRL decreased remark.

LOBBYING GROUP

After the report recommending reform was released, the Coalition of Major Professional and Participation Sports (COMPPS), a lobbying group for the NRL, the AFL and other sports bodies, collaborated a campaign to lobby politicians with constant messaging versus the restriction, stated three individuals knowledgeable about the preparation.

They declined to be determined citing the sensitivity of the subject.

COMPPS members welcomed political leaders to events and seated them near to sports body authorities, mostly from the NRL and AFL, who were briefed on how to talk about the effect of the marketing restriction, said 2 individuals involved in the preparation.

The members shared details about which political leaders to target based on who was prominent in federal government or passionate about a specific sport, individuals added.

COMPPS did not instantly react to ask for comment.

"You're not just buying them a ticket in the box and giving them hospitality, you have actually got their ear for the length of the video game," said Charles Livingstone, an associate professor of public health at Monash University and member of the World Health Organisation's Expert Group on Gambling.

"These guys remain in a position to plant concepts and to influence political leaders in manner ins which nobody else can."

Both the NRL and the AFL recorded their opposition to the ban in messages to Albanese within days of grand last occasions attended by the prime minister and other senior politicians last year. The AFL proposed an "option ... regulatory structure", according to an October 1 email from the AFL to Albanese. Albanese's office produced the e-mail following a discovery request by Pocock, the independent senator.

Albanese's workplace validated it had actually received the correspondence from both the NRL and AFL however did not provide details.

Louis Francis, a public health academic at Curtin University, stated the end result - betting reform stalled in the face of frustrating public assistance - was testimony to the "relationships and connections" sporting bodies could make by inviting political leaders to video games.

Free tickets for political leaders amounted to "an actually little cost to pay to get access to political decision makers," she stated. "And the return is fantastic." (Reporting by Byron Kaye, with additional reporting by Lewis Jackson; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)